01 / SOURCE
Collect
Store market, filing, news, and industry inputs with their source and snapshot date.
Commercial Space & Satellite Internet
LaurenceYang Commercial Space & Satellite Internet Research OS
Ask about a company, constellation, market signal, or strategic choice. The product shows its sources, runs repeatable valuation or risk calculations, marks missing fields, and saves the result as a report for you to review.
Ask in plain English
Companies · constellations · markets
Sources stay visible
You approve assumptions
Example research question
What supports this company’s moat?
01 / ASKAsk the research questionA company, comparison, or industry question.
02 / CHECKCheck sources and calculationsNumbers, sources, assumptions, and gaps.
03 / SAVESave the reportSources, assumptions, and gaps stay attached.
Full product demo
See one question become a research report.
The five-step example uses fixed data. Each button opens the product screen used for that step.
5 guided steps
Step 1 · Ask
Ask a clear question.
Choose a company, industry, comparison, or decision. The Workbench opens the matching research view.
Open Ask LaurenceYangExample questionPlain English is enough
What supports this satellite operator’s moat, and what could weaken it?
1
Understand the companyBusiness, financials, and valuation
2
Check the riskEvidence, events, and counterpoints
LaurenceYang routes the question. You make the final judgment.
Step 2 · Check evidence
Check what supports the answer.
Review the numbers, sources, assumptions, and missing-data notes before trusting the conclusion.
Open company researchEvidence checkWhat can the system support?
Financial statementsCovered
Valuation assumptionsVisible
Latest customer concentrationNot available
Missing data stays visibleLaurenceYang does not invent a value to complete the screen.
Step 3 · Compare
Compare the same fields and assumptions.
Put companies side by side without changing the evidence rules between them.
Open comparison workflowIllustrative comparisonSame evidence rules
FieldCompany ACompany B
Revenue trendFrom toolsFrom tools
Estimated valueSame DCFSame DCF
Missing dataKept blankKept blank
A live comparison needs provider coverage for at least two companies.
Step 4 · Run analysis
Open valuation, thesis, or market analysis when needed.
The first screen stays focused on the question; the extra analysis remains separate.
Open advanced analysisTest valueSee how assumptions change the result
Change the model or screen a wider set of companies.
Challenge the ideaLook for the weak point
Step 5 · Save report
Save the work.
Turn the research into a report you can review, update, and export to PDF.
Five steps completeAsk → Check evidence → Compare → Run analysis → Save report
Open report library
Research briefCompany decision reviewIllustrative outline · evidence labels stay visible
01OverviewQuestion and conclusion
02EvidenceNumbers and sources
03RisksCounterpoints and events
04AssumptionsCoverage and missing data
Easy to reviewEasy to updatePDF export
Step 1 of 5Choose a step or use the arrow keys.
Start in the Workbench, then open the page for the task.
The other pages handle satellite events, dated briefs, company topics, and concept research.
Research Workbench
Ask a question, compare companies, run a valuation, test a thesis, and save a report in one workspace.
Satellite Research Dashboard
Classify events, test thesis impact, and compare CEO and investor views.
Daily Review
Read the current evidence snapshot, changes, catalysts, and source freshness.
Weekly Brief
Track the thesis, counter-evidence, risks, and next review actions.
Company Briefs
Focused topic pages for versioned market snapshots, trends, alerts, peers, moat, and bull/bear views.
Knowledge Graph
Browse concepts, entities, relationships, and source references.
Calculations and narrative are separate.
Data tools produce the numbers, and the language layer summarizes their output. This public site uses dated snapshots and fixed, labeled examples; it has no live provider or model connection.
02 / TOOL
Calculate
Normalize identifiers, cross-check sources, calculate DCF, peers, screens, and risk signals.
03 / NARRATIVE
Explain
Summarize the tool results in plain English. If no AI model is connected, show a fixed sample response instead.
04 / REVIEW
Decide
Show assumptions, source dates, missing data, and counter-evidence for human review.
Every screen uses the same evidence rules.
Sources, calculations, missing-data labels, and reports follow one set of controls.
What the public site excludes.
The deployment contains fixed, labeled examples. It contains no live provider, model API, credential, or restricted Wiki full text.
Public portfolio release · Static snapshot
This deployment contains only the static demo.
The personal, non-commercial release contains dated examples and public previews. Provider adapters, local APIs, credentials, and restricted Wiki full text are not deployed.
Open the Workbench to follow the product flow. How It Works explains the calculations, data controls, and my contribution.